THE POETRY OF FEAR AND JOY

The Worlds of Lucille Hadzihalilovic. Severin Films (USA) 2026. 4 disc Blue Ray box set.

Over a period of 21 years Lucille Hadzihalilovic has produced a highly original body of work. Four feature films and a handful of shorts that have challenged our view of the relationship between children/adolescents socially controlled by adults, both visible and invisible, not in a conventional sense of upbringing and nurture but what happens when you split off the child from normality to develop in an experimental self-contained world: a poetical fantasy space where freedom and control create states of alternating between fear and joy.

Hadzihalilovic draws upon fairy tales and allegories, to situate her stories in an SF or Horror context, only to disarm the viewer by a daring perspective concerned with the evolution of the young self. She has a biological obsession with change and the passage of time - from caterpillar to butterfly where adult forces might save or destroy you in the process.

In a Hadzihalilovic film water is a significant character. We’ve evolved from the sea and are drawn back to water. This is apparent in her first feature Innocence (2004) and its opening images of rushing water, forest, earth and an underground cellar with a door mysteriously marked as number 3. We then cut to the interior of a secluded school for very young girls. There lies a coffin from out of which emerges six year old Iris. She’s met with warmth by six girls who all wear matching dresses and ribbons in their hair corresponding to their age and year in the school. Iris is given a red ribbon and is taken under the charge of 12 year old Bianca now wearing a violet ribbon. Although sub-plots introduce us to other girls, the adult female teachers and other menial staff it’s the journey of Iris and Bianca that will concern us most.

No boys are allowed in the school as the girls receive their education consisting of dance lessons, the study of animals and much recreation. The children have a great deal of free time but are not allowed to leave until their education is complete. Their teachers are kindly but firm. As one of them says of the girls they are “ugly little caterpillars” who must be patient and obey instructions, waiting to metamorphose into butterfly graduates.

There are beautifully shot scenes of children swimming and splashing in a lake; walking along a forest lit by lamps; displaying their dancing skills to tutors or simply walking alongside the walls of the grounds and contemplating what lies beyond their confines. Such moments are never exploitative but observational of the children’s slow development towards puberty. All are filmed so lyrically that you keep sensing that the idyll will one day be shattered. One or two children don’t accept the school regime and either escape or die an accidental death. But this is a world that naturally invokes the first poems of say Blake’s Songs of Innocence and Experience where apprehension and anticipation reign just before a euphoric coming through, the children’s return to the outside world: though at the climax of Innocence it’s not the deadening effects of Blakean experience but the joy of Bianca being bathed in water at a public square fountain and her sexual awakening.




The visuals of Innocence are never stilted by cute, sentimental beauty but alive and fluid with a surreal poetry that recalls the cinema of Jean Vigo and, in its scenes of subdued menace, the fragile tenderness of Georges Franju. As an adult audience we can project our anxiety on what is really going on with the children in this hidden, dream-like place but this tense projection is constantly dispelled because of Hadzihalilovic’s ability to create a state of wonderment and mystery so powerfully that explanations become redundant, even irrelevant. Innocence like Last Year at Marienbad becomes a seductive puzzle film that can take on numerous meanings or enjoyed for being a self-contained rites of passage enigma.

In Hadzihalilovic’s second feature Evolution (2015) we are kicked out of the young girls’ Eden and placed in a young boys’ hell of experimentation. At an unnamed community near the sea a boy named Nicolas sees the body of a dead boy with a red starfish on his side. His mother brings the body ashore and the other mothers assemble around it. Nicholas is suffering from an unnamed malady which Mother treats with a dubious medicine. She takes him to a hospital where a doctor operates on Nicolas. He doesn’t believe he is really ill and doubts that Mother is really his true mother. At night she and the other women writhe about in mud on the rocks by the sea and later on Nicolas sees what looks like suckers on her back. Like the appearance of the starfish these aquatic phenomena are threatening to the body.

As with Innocence you can marvel at the opening scenes of Evolution which, though now in muted colours, hark back to silent cinema avant-gardism (Jean Epstein’s films especially Finis Terrae is evoked). The rocks, sea, coral reef, Nicolas swimming beneath a dead body, that haunting star fish, Mother’s fish-like countenance and then thirty minutes into the film there’s a visually stunning recapitulation of the earlier discoveries and their threat: Nicolas lies on an operating table as the photography of Manuel Dacosse exquisitely reveals two tiny crosses of white light, resembling a starfish, on the boy’s open eyes.

In Innocence we had control of children with an ambivalent even suspect well being. This has now turned into malign SF / horror. If the little girls received experimental child rearing the little boys are subject to operations on their bodies to change them, like their so called mother’s, into a different species. Mother and child will return to the ocean – for a reproduction and shape shifting into disturbing mythological creatures is now possible. Suffice to say that Nicola’s friendship with the nurse Stella offers him a slither of hope. Evolution’s slippery (forgive the fish pun) narrative is less of a puzzle maker than a radical reinterpretation of a horror sea tale yarn (think William Hope Hodgson colliding with Darwinism and Frankenstein).

Texture, sound design, photography and performances exert a hypnotic power over the viewer. What am I seeing or perhaps dreaming? This is the constant question you ask when formulaic genre conventions are overturned and transformed by Hadzihalilovic’s great filmmaking confidence as, swirling in the weird darkness of her fable, there is a surprising sympathy not only for Evolution’s controlled but their controllers, even if a hospitalised friend of Nicolas’s says “They’re killing us.”




Earwig (2021) is the only disappointment of this box set. Technically it’s as brilliant as the other films but abstruse and hermetic: emotionally detached to the point of an icy coldness. The problem is that the film focuses more on the adults than the child. Not that the adults Albert (the guardian of Mia a little girl, who has no teeth, and must be kept in good health); Celeste (the barmaid Albert injures with a broken bottle) and Laurence (the mysterious man who befriends Celeste) aren’t interesting but their back story is made murky or non-existent. For me they felt like sub-plots that were fore-fronted too much so as to pull away from the story of the young girl. I wanted to learn more about the identity of Mia. Like Bianca from Innocence and Nicolas from Evolution all we learn is that Mia is being made ready for a new home, though this one has a Kafkaesque management.

If Earwig has been wrongly described by some as a near-noir body horror then it’s right to say that this film is closer to straight horror genre than any of the other Hadzihalilovic films. Though you might think of David Cronenberg and body explosions it reads as more gothic in sensibility than that. Earwig is remarkable for its moments of extreme violence. But the two attacks with a broken bottle and an attempted strangulation of a cat are shocks that feel alien and disruptive to Hadzihalilovic’s cinema (The beating of the girl in the school in Innocence is mild by comparison and in tone with the film’s depiction of control).

The M.R.James mezzotint story idea (People seeing presences slowly appearing and moving in to a picture of a country mansion) is a good supernatural one but remains undeveloped in Earwig. I’d liked to have learnt more about why Mia throws herself in a lake. And why Celeste briefly appears to be watching this act of suicide. Earwig is powerfully atmospheric but tends to meander rather than integrate its ideas. It’s overlong and perhaps would have worked more successfully as a sombre short film. And although there’s a sense of dreamy ‘passivity’ about the children in Hadzihalilovic’s films I really wanted Mia to do the conventional horror film reaction and scream out terrified at her morose keeper and sinister dental technician.

Earwig is a sealed-in mysterious story that doesn’t, despite its intensely grim and ominous settings achieve a convincing resolution. Celeste’s revenge on Albert for disfiguring her feels insufficient. I was left more concerned about the fate of young Mia: but the script drops that. This dark ride of a journey hits a cul-de-sac and I was left uncertain about Hadzihalilovc’s next project, The Ice Tower. However she returned back on powerful form.




The inspiration for Hadzihalilovic’s The Ice Tower (2025) is Hans Christian Anderson’s iconic fairy tale The Snow Queen. Part of that story concerns a snow queen who demands a human sacrifice. This is narrated off screen and is one of the few remaining components of Anderson’s tale employed by Hadzihalilovic. For her The Ice Tower is not to be a literal adaptation. It’s a coming of age account of a teenage girl, dual-named, Jean/Bianca’s infatuation with an actress playing the snow queen in a film studio, near the mountains of Italy’s South Tyrol, where reality, dream and movie artifice are seamlessly fused. Everything becomes a persuasive re-entering and reimagining of a mythic force. You could say that this is what eventually happens to the little girls in Innocence who leave their supervised environment, reach adolescence and face the trauma of growing up with adult needs and desires. So in The Ice Tower we come round full circle.

The Ice Tower’s remarkable production designs (Julia Irribarria) and superbly atmospheric photography (Jonathan Ricquebourg) keeps challenging the viewer about the competing power of the false over the real and vice versa; all the time compellingly drawing us into a seductive narrative. It’s a wondrous but dangerous, icy place that creates a trance-like state - superbly realised by Lucile Hadzihalilovic and her wonderfully mesmeric direction.

All of Hadzihalilovic’s films are allegories which contain a potential corruption of innocence theme that both attracts and repels within a very personal world. However she does draw on the inspiration of some masters of film in The Ice Tower. There are numerous references to Michael Powel and Alfred Hitchcock. A signalling of the poster of The Red Shoes in the film studio and the snow queen and her potential victim walking to the edge of a snowy precipice recalls Powell’s set recreation of the Himalayas in Black Narcissus. The trouble on set when they are trying to handle a raven mirrors Tippi Hedren fighting off bird attacks in The Birds. And even the whorl in the hair bun of the chilly receptionist, at the teenager’s hotel, evokes the look of Kim Novak in Vertigo.


I love the manner in which The Ice Tower is sometimes shot through the lens of a crystal and this naturally fuses with the light of a film projector, suggesting a multi-faceted playing with our perception of reality. The Ice Tower is a haunting coming of age film which for Bianca/Jeanne ends in deep disappointment. Both women, as real people and not figures of myth, are equally hurt. If the snow queen actress (acted by a splendidly eerie Marion Cotillard) is lonely and depressed then the young woman who’s entered her life is unsure and frightened in the face of the snow queen who is mistakenly chosen as a mother figure.

The snow queen’s subsequent assault on Bianca/Jeanne (played by the outstanding newcomer Clara Pacini) appears not simply lesbian desire but a pathetic cry for help. The women’s vulnerable states clash but cannot be reconciled with authentic affection. In this fairy tale of denied sacrifice and conflicting needs a love story isn’t allowed to unfold. The Ice Tower is almost mainstream compared to Hadzihalilovic’s previous films but set beside most Hollywood fantasy confections its subtly radical.

If for me Innocence still remains Hadzihalilovic’s masterpiece, then Evolution and The Ice Tower tie for her second best film place. Even taking into account the failure of Earwig you have to applaud a quartet of films that have made a significant mark on 21st century cinema. Hadzihalilovic is a visionary auteur who matters.

Severin’s generous box set filled with many extras and two bewitching shorts has to be seen, not only to entrance, but be believed for how film can still deliver subversive magic.
  • Alan Price. (This review originally published in London Grip)




FROM MARS TO MYTH

Invaders from Mars (Menzies) BFI Blu Ray and Ultra HD.

William Cameron Menzies was the supreme art designer in Hollywood during the 1920’s and 1930’s. Menzies’s ability to create an arresting spatial look for his films raised him to the status of an auteur. He was, along with Van Nest Polglase, one of the few production designers to be billed, rivalling the director, in large credits over a film. Menzies’s own career as a director is uneven but Things to Come and Invaders from Mars are undoubtedly his finest films.

Invaders from Mars was rushed into production and released just before War of the Worlds in 1953. Both are alien invasion films. But Invaders from Mars is very much from the viewpoint of a young boy. The film unfolds like a comic book both frightening and enchanting. It’s the Cold War era where in the parochial small town comfort of the American Dream you could be body snatched and mind controlled.

David (Jimmy Hunt) witnesses a flying saucer land in a sandpit area near to his home. David tells his scientist father George (Leif Erikson) and he investigates. When he returns he’s undergone a change of personality and acts like a menacing zombie. Other people start disappearing into the sandpit and then reappear to act in a highly aggressive manner. This is a Martian invasion by creatures able to internally control human beings. David convinces government official Dr. Blake (Helena Carter) and astronomer Dr. Kelston (Arthur Franz) that this is a real threat to humanity. And the military is brought in to combat the invaders.

Invaders from Mars has justifiably been praised for its technical marvels: atmospheric lighting, expressive quasi-surreal sets, heightened camera angles, colour filtering within a beautiful Eastman colour frame and haunting music. Stephen Spielberg, Martin Scorsese and Joe Dante saw the film when they were children and absorbed its visual information that went on to influence their adult filmmaking careers. However the legendary Stanley Kubrick isn’t mentioned.

I realise that Kubrick never wanted 2001: A Space Odyssey to be a space monster movie but at one point he must have watched SF material like Invaders from Mars and ignored it only to be have been unconsciously influenced by their bug-eyed power (I’m thinking of the Invaders creature that’s meant to represent the height of Martian intelligence: its silent, large, almost Buddha like head, with shifting eyes and tentacles for arms, enclosed in a sealed off glass container as possibly being an inspirational trigger for the idea of the looming foetus star child of 2001).

Yet for me it’s not the special effects that are the most disturbing feature of this film but a brief moment of domestic physical violence. When the now alien possessed George returns home he warns his son David to never talk of what he’s seen. Then he delivers a back handed slap to David’s face. It’s brutal, cruel, shattering and for me one of the most powerful moments of unexpected violence in all cinema. The formerly caring (arguably over idealised kind father) at the beginning has become a monster far more threatening than the Martians in green suits. George is an untrammelled evil force. And when his wife Mary (Hillary Brook) becomes his monstrous partner we experience two chilling horrors intent to tear up their family, community and hence the American dream.


Unfortunately the story line of the parents isn’t fully realised. Most of the other victims of the sand pit takeover are destroyed by the Martians once they’ve been captured by the police or army. George and Mary are apprehended but not destroyed (Why, I’m not sure) to be operated on (never shown) in hospital and returned to normality. But I missed their nasty behaviour which was so malevolent in the earlier scenes. You feel that Invaders from Mars set up an Invasion of the Body Snatchers idea but dropped it as this was more of kid’s movie – an exciting family entertainment for an audience that wanted their very fifties paranoid fears of invasion to be dispelled.

The distributors asked for a longer version of Invaders from Mars to fit its programming times. So we have old army manoeuvres footage that’s dramatically dull and mere padding. And the European market wanted a different ending, that the army footage be replaced with a later filmed (not by Menzies) scene of David and Dr. Blake being given an observatory lecture about probable life forces and energy in the cosmos. That is arch and clunky. It and the alternative ending are available as extras on this disc. I can live with that other ending but is the American ending really a cop out?

We usually groan at the thought that the invasion has only been a bad dream. But Menzies and his scriptwriter leave open the fact that this might be a reoccurring nightmare, though not of the quality of its all happening again horror of say Dead of Night. David’s exclaimed “Gee, Whizz” at the appearance of a flying saucer allows boyhood optimism and wonder to triumph over ET and domestic ruptures. Deliberate ambiguity? I will say no more.

Invaders from Mars is a classic American fifties SF film. It’s flawed but can be comfortably placed at the back of the queue with those other classics The Day the Earth Stood Still, War of the Worlds, Them and The Incredible Shrinking Man.
  • Alan Price


Editors note: This is the film that Martin Kottmeyer has identified as being responsible for much of the imagery described in Betty and Barney Hills hypnotic regressions. In particular the 'needle in the navel' sequence of Betty's 'surgical examination' and the curious detail of Betty's description of the nose of the aliens as resembling Jimmy Durante's.

You can read Kottmeyers article, 'Entirely Unpredisposed: The Cultural Background of UFO Reports' here: https://magoniamagazine.blogspot.com/2013/11/entirely-unpredisposed-cultural.html

DREAM JOURNEY

Rose of Nevada (Mark Jenkin)
2025. Produced by Denzil Monk for Bosena, with support from the BFI and Film4. On General release in Irish and UK cinemas from April 24th 2026.

A young two man crew, with an elderly sea dog of a captain, take to sea on a fishing trip in the economically poorer present. They achieve a good catch but on return are time-slipped back to their Cornish village as it existed thirty years previous, when the community was financially prosperous. One of the crew accepts his fate as good fortune whilst the other feels trapped in a nightmare where his wife and daughter are no longer present.

That’s the SF premise of Mark Jenkin’s effectively disturbing Rose of Nevada. Out of a ghostly sea ballad Jenkin’s crafts an eerily atmospheric tale of identities lost and wrongly re-claimed by a community, insistent that you stay put and constantly fish for them, forever.

Any disbelieve is suspended owing to the fine acting of George Mackay as Nick - in need of money to fix his leaking roof, through which he crashes, suggesting a portal to another time. And there’s Callum Turner as Liam, an opportunist and stranger to the community, adopting the new role of father and husband for a pleased and widowed 1993 family.

What also drives Rose of Nevada is Jenkin’s unerring eye for odd detail combined with an editing that keeps shifting the ground from under our feet (Are we in dream time, alternative universe time or even stable real time?). Ambiguity pervades a film of time and memory determined by a calm or stormy sea.

All is beautifully photographed in 16mm digitised to 35mm where red infiltrates the frame and you imagine things decomposing. Above all Rose of Nevada is about the filming of the natural world and mundane objects that signal menacing traps for its characters. It becomes a time slip container always in danger of falling into the rusty beauty of decay – the damaged roof, cliff top rocks with its foliage and flowers: much shiny if tacky decoration of a 90’s pub; a warning scratched in a cabin saying “Get off the boat” or even simply a hot meal of very red looking beans and sausages (provided by Nick’s creepy new parents): such things consistently alarm and mysteriously disconcert Nick and we the audience.

When Nick does fleetingly meet again, in reality or fantasy, his family, from a lost time, Nick’s wife Emily (Mae Voogd) simply says there is “No time.” An observation that’s both consoling and alarming. Either time, as Nick’s normally experienced it, isn’t the total reality, doesn’t exist or there’s literally no time left now for Nick to be reunited with his family. This is a really moving and stand-out moment in Rose of Nevada: haunting, plangent and very memorable.

Rose of Nevada is the third part of a Cornish trilogy that includes the powerfully realist Bait and the folk horror excursions of Enys Men. It’s a little too slow at the beginning and Jenkin’s script falls back into mannerism’s of dialogue that for me flawed his first film Bait. I appreciate that in remote Cornish sea villages people still use archaic words like “tis” and “hark” but when they are accompanied by long, pregnant pauses it kept reminding me of the stilted social realism of some 60s/70s British TV and cinema.

Although speech and reaction initially falter, Jenkin’s visual signature triumphs in the storytelling. His direction, photography and music sound design make for an intelligent, confident and original filmmaker. I suspect Jenkin’s been influenced by the documentaries of John Grierson and Robert Flaherty, with their great broad feel for nature, and also the sea horror fiction of William Hope Hodgson and time travelling of Philip K. Dick. But Jenkin is an original artist and on a first viewing Rose of Nevada is perhaps his most mature, original and boldest film yet.

Rose of Nevada is a remarkable cyclic dream journey that’s alternatively disturbing and strangely reassuring about what’s lost and unexpectedly found in Nick’s new weird time zone of communal duty and expected response.
  • Alan Price

THE ICE TOWER

The Ice Tower. (Hadzihalilovic) 2025 A BFI Release

The inspiration for Hadzihalilovic’s The Ice Tower is Hans Christian Anderson’s iconic fairy tale The Snow Queen. But this isn’t a conventional adaptation or even a re-imagining of the story but a fantasy film depicting a teenage girl’s infatuation with an actress, playing the snow queen in a film studio near the mountains of Italy’s South Tyrol: here reality, dream and movie artifice are seamlessly fused: a supremely confident blurring of setting and sensibility that makes for a hauntingly beautiful watch.
🔽

Witches, Druids and Kings

Ronald Hutton. Witches, Druids and King Arthur. Hambledon, 2003.

Writing in the Margins

Roy Wallis (
Ed.). On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. Sociological Review Monograph no. 27. University of Keele, 1979.

Sight Unseen

Budd Hopkins and Carol Rainey, Sight Unseen: Science, UFO Invisibility and Transgenic Beings, Atria Books, New York, 2003.

Conspiracy or cock-up?

Jenny Randles. The UFO Conspiracy: The First Forty Years. Blandford Press, 1987
.

Visiting Paranoia Gulch

Jacques Vallée. Revelations: Alien Contact and Human Deception. Souvenir Press, 1992.
 

Lore of the Land

Jennifer Westwood and Jacqueline Simpson. The Lore of the Land: A Guide to England's Legends from Spring Heeled Jack to the Witches of Warboys. Penguin Books, 2005.

Encounters at Indian Head

Karl Pflock and Peter Brookesmith (editors). Encounters at Indian Head: The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Abduction Revisited. Anomalist Books, 2007.


Satanic Conspiracy

Gareth J. Medway. Lure of the Sinister: The Unnatural History of Satanism. New York University Press, 2001.

Radical Perceptions

Bob Couttie. Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press, 1988
.

French Connections

Jean Bastide. La Memoire des OVNI. Mercure de France, 1978.

Jean-Francois Boédec. Fantastiques rencontres au bout du monde: les apparitions de phenomenes aerospatiaux non identifies dans le Finistere. Le Signor, 1982.

Planetary Dreams

Robert Shapiro. Planetary Dreams: The Quest to Discover Life Beyond Earth. John Wiley and Sons, 1999.

Myths of Reality

Simon Danser. Myths of Reality. Alternative Albion, 2005.

Cunning Folk


Emma Wilby. Cunning Folk and Familiar Spirits: Shamanistic Traditions in Early Modern British Witchcraft and Magic. Sussex Academic Press, 2005.

A care-worn young woman, going about her business, meets a stranger; an elderly man with a grey beard, wearing a grey coat and the clothes of the past generation. He carries a white wand in his hand. He asks her why she is so sad.

An Abductee Reviews 'Abduction'

Jenny Randles. Abduction. Robert Hale, 1988.

Occultism and Modernity

Alex Owen. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. University of Chicago Press, 2004.

Corinna Treitel. A Science for the Soul: Occultism and the Genesis of the German Modern. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.

A Treat of Tricks

Nicholas Rogers. Halloween: from Pagan Ritual to Party Night. Oxford University Press, 2003. 
🔻

The Geller After-Effect

Uri Geller and Guy Lyon Playfair. The Geller Effect, Jonathan Cape, 1986.
🔻

Professional Prickers

P. G. Maxwell-Stuart. Witch Hunters: Professional Prickers, Unwitchers and Witch Finders of the Renaissance. Tempus, 2003. 

Leap too Far

Gordon Cooper with Bruce Henderson. Leap of Faith: an Astronaut's Journey into the Unknown. HarperCollins, 2000. 

Georgia on my Mind

Jim Miles. Weird Georgia: Close Encounters, Strange Creatures, and Unexplained Phenomena. Cumberland House, 2000. 

Bad Astronomy

Philip Plait. Bad Astronomy: misconceptions and misuses revealed, from astrology to the moon landing 'hoax'. John Wiley and Sons, 2002.

Sense on Conspiracies

David Alexander. Conspiracies and Coverups . Berkely Books, 2002. 

A popular introduction to the world of conspiracy theories, with sections on everything from the sexual politics of the JFK and FDR eras, to the wild tales of Roswell. 

All Together Now!

Robert Trundle. UFOs: Politics, God and Science. European Press Academic Publishing, 2000.

Remote From Reality

Tim Rifat. Remote Viewing: what it is, who uses it and how to do it. Vision Paperbacks, 2001.

Hearing Colours

John Harrison. Synaesthesia: the Strangest Thing. Oxford University Press, 2001.

American Monsters

Philip L Rife. America's Loch Ness Monsters. Writers' Club Press, 2000. 
Philip L Rife. Bigfoot Across America. Writers Club Press, 2000.
Philip L Rife. America's Nightmare Monsters. Writers Club Press, 2001